Analysis: i) In Muhammad Munir and others v. Umer Hayat and others (2023 SCMR 1339)

Lahore High Court

CONCLUSION: i) Evidence of lay man, especially relatives like son, daughter, wife, etc. may be relevant but being biased and exaggerated it cannot be conclusive. ii) The appearance of a medical practitioner in the witness -box is necessary to establish the plea of mental unsoundness or d isabilit

Loading the full judgment on LexPK…