India (SCI) reaffirmed the above distinction in R.V.E. Venkatachala Gounder v. Arulmigu Viswesaraswami & V.P. Temple [2003 (4) R.C.R. (Civil) 705]. It held

Lahore High Court

that ob jections as to the admissibility of documents in evidence fall into two categories: (i) those that challenge the admissibility of the document itself, and (ii) those that relate solely to the mode of proof, alleging it to be irregular or insufficient. In the first case, the mere fact t

Loading the full judgment on LexPK…