matters already adjudicated. It referred to Haji Muhammad Boota v. Member (Revenue)

Balochistan High Court

BOR (2010 SCMR 1049), noting that errors requiring detailed discussion or reassessment of evidence do not fall within the scope o f review. The Court found that the petitioners’ grounds for review were misconceived and lacked merit. The petitioners failed to identify any apparent error or overlo

Loading the full judgment on LexPK…