iii) It is importantly noted that in case titled, “Tanveer Mahboob and another v. Haroon and others” (2003 SCMR 480), it was observed that in a case in which a

Lahore High Court

RULE: 3, C.P.C. would not affect the proceedings in the suit and decree, if ultimately passed, unless it is shown that due to omission of appointment of guardian -at-litem of a mino r, who was being represented by his natural guardian, the minor was caused prejudice and the objection would be of

Loading the full judgment on LexPK…