The Court relied on judicial precedents, including Muhammad Hassan and Another v. The State (2024 SCMR 1427), to conclude that the appellant should be acquitted due to

Sindh High Court

multiple contradictions and procedural flaws in the prosecution’s case. Significance: This judgment reinforces the principle that when there are significant discrepancies, contradictions, and procedural lapses in the prosecution’s case, the benefit of doubt must be given to the accused. The case

Loading the full judgment on LexPK…